Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

5 Takeaways: More Policy, Few Punches In Unusually Civil GOP Debate

Republican presidential candidates, Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., left, and Donald Trump, debate on the campus of the University of Miami on Thursday in Coral Gables, Florida.
Joe Raedle
/
Getty Images
Republican presidential candidates, Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., left, and Donald Trump, debate on the campus of the University of Miami on Thursday in Coral Gables, Florida.

Something strange happened during Thursday night's GOP presidential debate — it was actually civil and reserved.

There was no mention of body parts and/or mudslinging between Donald Trump and the other candidates — all of which punctuated the Republican presidential conversation just a week ago.

The first half of the debate was policy-driven, addressing immigration, trade and tariffs, Social Security and more.

Marco Rubio had the home-field advantage in the CNN debate from Miami, Fla., and delivered a strong performance. But it might be too little, too late as Rubio tries to stave off Trump in the Florida senator's backyard. And with no punches thrown against the presumptive front-runner, Trump didn't leave damaged.

Ohio Gov. John Kasich's low-key style that was a welcome relief for some during the other, higher-octane debates, instead led him to fade into the background. Kasich needs to win his home state on March 15th to keep his long-shot White House hopes alive.

And Texas Sen. Ted Cruz continued to make the argument he's the only candidate with a real chance of stopping Trump, even as the real estate mogul struck a unifying tone as he urged the GOP to come together behind him.

Here were some of the top moments.

Trump's general election pivot

There were no insults or bombast from the GOP front-runner as he kicked off the debate. Instead, he made an argument to the so-called GOP establishment — unite behind me, and we can win.

"Millions and millions of people are going out to the polls and they're voting. They're voting out of enthusiasm. They're voting out of love," he argued. "We're taking people from the Democrat [sic] Party. We're taking people as independents, and they're all coming out and the whole world is talking about it. It's very exciting. I think, frankly, the Republican establishment, or whatever you want to call it, should embrace what's happening."

He kept a positive tone throughout the debate, and at the end of the night told CNN the whole affair had been very "elegant."

Political correctness on Islam

Trump was pressed by moderator Jake Tapper on his controversial statements, specifically some of his heated rhetoric on Muslims and comments to CNN on Wednesday that "Islam hates us."

"Did you mean all 1.6 billion Muslims?" Tapper asked.

"I mean a lot of them. I mean a lot of them," Trump maintained. "There's something going on that maybe you don't know about, maybe a lot of other people don't know about, but there's tremendous hatred. And I will stick with exactly what I said to [CNN anchor] Anderson Cooper."

Rubio pushed back, arguing that such heated rhetoric is harmful to the country at home and abroad.

"The problem is, presidents can't just say anything they want. It has consequences, here and around the world," he said, pointing to the many Muslims serving in the U.S. armed forces.

"Marco talks about consequences. Well, we've had a lot of consequences, including airplanes flying into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon and could have been the White House," Trump argued back. "There have been a lot of problems. Now you can say what you want, and you can be politically correct if you want. I don't want to be so politically correct. I like to solve problems. We have a serious, serious problem of hate."

But Rubio jabbed back, with one of his strongest lines of the debate: "I'm not interested in being politically correct. I'm not interested in being politically correct. I'm interested in being correct."

Trump takes both sides of the issues

Save for those few hits from Rubio, Trump was barely criticized or even pushed by his GOP rivals, even as he took some seemingly contradictory positions.

Trump admitted that as a businessman he's used the H1-B guest-worker visa program to bring highly-skilled workers to the United States, but that he "shouldn't be allowed to use it."

He boasted, "There's nobody on this stage that's more pro-Israel than I am." But Trump also said he'd tell the Palestinians he was neutral in the century-old conflict, so he could try to broker a Middle East peace deal.

On Social Security, he criticized Democrats for not working to save the entitlement program but then said it was his "absolute intention to leave Social Security the way it is. Not increase the age and to leave it as is."

Rubio did press him somewhat on that, questioning his math.

"The numbers don't add up," Rubio argued. "You know, when I ran for the Senate in 2010, I came out and said we're going to have to make changes to Social Security, and everyone said that's the end of your campaign. In Florida, you can't talk about that, but people know that it's the truth here in Florida."

Cuba in focus in Florida

Rubio — who, like Cruz, is the son of Cuban immigrants — got his biggest cheers of the night when he pushed back again on Trump over Cuba.

Trump said he was "somewhere in the middle" between President Obama's move to open diplomatic relations with Cuba and Rubio's skepticism over the island's human rights record.

"I would want to make a good deal, I would want to make a strong, solid, good deal because right now, everything is in Cuba's favor," the businessman argued. "Right now, everything, every single aspect of this deal is in Cuba's favor."

Rubio fought back, saying Cuba had to become free and democratic before any "deal."

"Here's a good deal — Cuba has free elections, Cuba stops putting people in jail for speaking out, Cuba has freedom of the press... And you know what? Then we can have a relationship with Cuba. That's a good deal," Rubio said to wild applause.

Violence at Trump rallies

Near the end of the debate, Tapper finally pressed Trump on the elephant in the room — news about an attendee at a rally of his in North Carolina who was charged after allegedly punching an African-American protester in the face.

"This is hardly the first incident of violence breaking out at one of your rallies," Tapper said, asking Trump whether he believed he had "done anything to create a tone where this kind of violence would be encouraged?"

"There is some anger," Trump said, claiming he hadn't seen the specific incident. "There's also great love for the country. It's a beautiful thing in many respects. But I certainly do not condone that at all, Jake."

Tapper, though, quoted comments Trump had made at his rallies about protesters, such as he'd "like to punch him in the face" and "knock the crap out of him."

"We have some protesters who are bad dudes, they have done bad things," Trump said. "They are swinging, they are really dangerous and they get in there and they start hitting people." Reporters who have been on the trail with the GOP candidate say they have never seen protesters throwing punches.

None of Trump's GOP rivals criticized him on the issue.

"Washington isn't listening to the people. And that's the frustration that is boiling over," Cruz responded.

"Jake, here's what I think is happening," Kasich interjected. "There are people out there who are worried about their jobs. They're worried that somebody is going to come in and tell them they're out of work and they're 54 years old and they don't know where they're going to get another job, a man and a woman."

"On the issue of anger. Yes, people are angry," Rubio said. "Of course they're angry. Every institution in America has been failing us for the better part of 20 years or 30 years. But leadership is not about using the anger, leadership is about using the anger to motivate us, not to define us."

Copyright 2021 NPR. To see more, visit https://www.npr.org.

Jessica Taylor is a political reporter with NPR based in Washington, DC, covering elections and breaking news out of the White House and Congress. Her reporting can be heard and seen on a variety of NPR platforms, from on air to online. For more than a decade, she has reported on and analyzed House and Senate elections and is a contributing author to the 2020 edition of The Almanac of American Politics and is a senior contributor to The Cook Political Report.